There has been a lot of misinformation and fear mongering from the B´ÎÔª¹ÙÍøÍøÖ·˜noB´ÎÔª¹ÙÍøÍøÖ·™ side of the Proportional Representation debate, and as a young person concerned about our democratic future IB´ÎÔª¹ÙÍøÍøÖ·™d like to take a look at some of the facts.
First, the spurious claim that Pro Rep will enable far-right or extremist parties. The electoral system, whether that be First Past The Post or Pro Rep, does not inherently lead to the rise of far-right agendas. These are a result of the political culture, and often gain popularity in response to harsh austerity measures and stark inequality.
And if youB´ÎÔª¹ÙÍøÍøÖ·™re not convinced, remember that under the pro rep system, a party must receive a minimum of 5 per cent of the province-wide vote to win a seat.
It also important to note that Pro Rep systems are actually the norm across the democratic world. There are only four democracies left using the outdated FPTP system B´ÎÔª¹ÙÍøÍøÖ·“ the UK, US, India, and Canada. FPTP itself does not protect against far-right populists.
Nine out of 10 top OECD economies use Pro Rep systems. Research shows that countries with pro rep voting systems score better on numerous indicators B´ÎÔª¹ÙÍøÍøÖ·“ including tolerance, quality of life, income equality, and environmental performance.
This is because pro rep systems do not create false majorities, where parties can win 100% of the power with less than 40 per cent of the vote, and ignore the remaining 60 per cent.
Where cross-party co-operation is the norm, better public policy is produced, with a longer term view and broad appeal.
Under Pro Rep, every vote would finally count. So vote yes to pro rep in the upcoming referendum and letB´ÎÔª¹ÙÍøÍøÖ·™s finally catch up with the rest of the democratic world.
Stacey OB´ÎÔª¹ÙÍøÍøÖ·™Sullivan
Victoria