BԪַ

Skip to content

Okanagan killer denied absolute discharge by B.C. Court of Appeal

VernonBԪַs Kenneth Scott Barter remains BԪַsignificant threat to publicBԪַ: decision
13241753_web1_180824-VMS-a-BCAppealCourt

There will be no absolute discharge from a Lower Mainland psychiatric facility for a Vernon man found not criminally responsible for the death of his friend in 2010.

The B.C. Court of Appeal dismissed Kenneth Scott BarterBԪַs application, agreeing with the B.C. Review BoardBԪַs decision that Barter remains a BԪַsignificant threat to the public.BԪַ

Barter was found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder on Jan. 10, 2011 on a charge of second degree murder in connection with the death of Nathan Mayrhofer in a Vernon apartment building in 2010.

Barter and Mayrhofer had been out drinking when Mayrhofer spent the night at BarterBԪַs apartment. Early the next morning, Barter struck a sleeping Mayrhofer over the head with a hammer, put a plastic bag over his head and dragged his body to the bathtub. After leaving to go get cigarettes, Barter returned and dismembered MayrhoferBԪַs body, cleaned up his apartment, and disposed of the cutting tools. He told his parents the next day what he had done.

Barter had no prior history of violence.

He was diagnosed with schizophrenia, an alcohol-use disorder (in full sustained remission as of 2018) and Tourette disorder.

In January 2015, the B.C. Review Board granted Barter a conditional discharge (meaning he could leave the facility as long as he was escorted) and that status was continued after reviews in 2016, 2017 and 2018.

The board denied BarterBԪַs application for an absolute discharge, citing evidence of BԪַcontinuing inflexibility, rigid thinking and sense of entitlement,BԪַ and the opinion of BarterBԪַs psychiatrist, who feels Barter BԪַcontinues to exhibit symptoms of his mental disorder, with the result that he remains a significant threat to the public.BԪַ

BԪַIn these circumstances, the boardBԪַs decision that he remain on a conditional discharge cannot be said to be unreasonable,BԪַ wrote the panel of three judges, who dismissed BarterBԪַs appeal.



roger@vernonmorningstar.com

Like us on and follow us on .



About the Author: Vernon Morning Star Staff

Read more


(or

BԪַ

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }