BԪַ

Skip to content

Mother, daughter sued by Chilliwack society for misappropriating $1.4M

Kathleen Mosa, Erin Mosa BԪַfraudulently, wrongfully, and secretlyBԪַ spent society money, claim says
web1_220728-cpl-housingannouncement-video_7
Kathleen Mosa, (centre) former executive director of WilmaBԪַs Transition Society, is being sued by the society for misappropriation. Mosa is flanked by Housing Minister Ahmed Hussen and Chilliwack Mayor Ken Popove at an affordable housing announcement in Chilliwack on Thursday, July 28, 2022. (Jenna Hauck/ Chilliwack Progress file)

WilmaBԪַs Transition Society of Chilliwack filed a notice of civil claim on May 2 in B.C. Supreme Court against two former employees for misappropriating at least $1.4 million.

The defendants, Kathleen Mosa, the former executive director of WilmaBԪַs Transition Society, and her daughter Erin Mosa, a former BԪַhomelessness prevention and support workerBԪַ were terminated by the society on April 9, for BԪַjust causeBԪַ due to unauthorized transactions, the notice of civil claim states.

The pair had been in the societyBԪַs employ since 2009. WilmaBԪַs Transition Society provides transition house, second stage housing and other supports to women and children fleeing interpersonal violence.

It was a complaint received by the society in August 2023 that led to the process of filing a civil claim in court against the former employees.

The complainant alleged that Kathleen and Erin had misappropriated funds, which led to further investigation and discovery by society officials. They found that the pair had, since at least April 2020: BԪַfraudulently, wrongfully, and secretly, either individually or in concertBԪַ charged personal purchases to the societyBԪַs credit card and bank accounts, the claim states.

The wrongful charges and transactions, unrelated to the societyBԪַs business, included cash withdrawals, personal cheques, e-transfers, as well as purchases of: groceries, gas, dining, furniture, clothing, electronics, gift cards, airfare, hotels, beauty products, alcohol, casino, and more. There were also purchases from stores such as Bootlegger, Old Navy, Smash + Tess, SportChek, Best Buy, and Apple.

The claim states WilmaBԪַs Transition Society is bringing action against their ex-employees for: BԪַmisappropriation, conversion, conspiracy, fraud, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, negligence, gross negligence and breaches of fiduciary obligations.BԪַ

As the executive director since 2012, Kathleen Mosa was a BԪַkey employeeBԪַ privy to the financial details, and BԪַafforded discretion and autonomyBԪַ to act in ways that could hurt the society, BԪַsuch that the society was vulnerable to Kathleen in her exercise of that discretion,BԪַ the claim noted.

The unauthorized transactions were either for KathleenBԪַs or ErinBԪַs BԪַpersonal benefit,BԪַ it alleged, or for that of their immediate family, and were not justified as business expenses.

BԪַThe unauthorized transactions did not relate to any legitimate purpose pertaining to the societyBԪַs business or affairs, did not further the societyBԪַs mandate, were not justified business expenditures and were not in the best interests of the society,BԪַ the claim continued.

There has been no evidence of any repayment by the defendants for any of the transactions.

BԪַThe extent of Kathleen and ErinBԪַs misappropriation is not known. Since April 1, 2020, the society estimates that the unauthorized transactions total $1,397,704.BԪַ

Since most of the societyBԪַs funding comes from government sources through funding agreements, and the wrongful actions of the two former employees BԪַhave caused the society to violate their contribution agreementsBԪַ and BԪַsignificantlyBԪַ impacted the organizationBԪַs future and financial viability, the claim states.

BԪַAs a result of unauthorized transactions Kathleen or Erin, or either one of them have been unjustly enriched to the corresponding deprivation of the society,BԪַ it continued, adding thereBԪַs BԪַno juristic reason entitling Kathleen or Erin to that enrichment.BԪַ

Under BԪַrelief soughtBԪַ the claimants are seeking against the defendants, jointly and severally, damages in an amount to be proven at trial BԪַequal to the total amountBԪַ of the $1.4 million in unauthorized transactions. They seek damages for breach of trust, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence and more.

The society is also claiming the right to any property from the proceeds of the transactions, the right to trace all proceeds to their assets. In addition to a preservation order to preserve the value of their assets, theyBԪַre seeking that the pair make restitution to the society, and disgorge any benefits.

The actions of the two ex-employees are described in the claim as BԪַmalicious, high-handed, callous and reprehensible,BԪַ which entitles the society to punitive damages, it argues, and the audit and legal expenses were cited under the BԪַspecial damagesBԪַ section.

READ MORE:

The defendants have 21 days to file a response to the civil claim.

Breaking BԪַ You Need To Know

Sign up for a free account today and start receiving our exclusive newsletters.

Sign Up with google Sign Up with facebook

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and apply.

Reset your password

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and apply.

A link has been emailed to you - check your inbox.



Don't have an account? Click here to sign up


Jennifer Feinberg

About the Author: Jennifer Feinberg

I have been a Chilliwack Progress reporter for 20+ years, covering city hall, Indigenous, business, and climate change stories.
Read more



(or

BԪַ

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }