Every Christmas growing up in Minnesota, Jimmy DartsBԪַ parents gave him $200 in cash: $100 for himself and $100 for a stranger.
Now, with over 12 million followers on TikTok and several million more on other platforms, is his full-time job.
, whose real surname is Kellogg, is one of the biggest creators of BԪַkindness content,BԪַ a subset of social media videos devoted to helping strangers in need, often with cash amassed through GoFundMe and other crowdfunding methods. A growing number of creators like Kellogg give away thousands of dollars BԪַ sometimes even more BԪַ on camera as they also encourage their large followings to donate.
BԪַThe internet is a pretty crazy, pretty nasty place, but thereBԪַs still good things happening on there,BԪַ Kellogg told The Associated Press.
Not everyone likes these videos, though, with some viewers deeming them, at their best, performative, and at their worst, exploitative.
Critics argue that recording a stranger, often unknowingly, and sharing a video of them online to gain social media clout is problematic. Beyond clout, content creators can make money off the views they get on individual videos. When views reach the millions, as they often do for Kellogg and his peers, they make enough to .
Comedian , a content creator formerly known online as BԪַScumbag Dad,BԪַ creates parodies designed to highlight the faults he finds with this content BԪַ and its proponents BԪַ as one of the most vocal critics of BԪַkindness content.BԪַ
BԪַA lot of young people have a very utilitarian mindset. They think of things only in measurable value: BԪַIt doesnBԪַt matter what he did, he helped a million peopleBԪַ,BԪַ Podray said.
Recording practices prompt questions of ethics
From the recording devices and methods down to the selection of subjects, BԪַkindness contentBԪַ BԪַ like everything on social media BԪַ exists on a spectrum.
Some creators approach strangers and ask them for advice or for a favor, and if they bite, they receive a prize. Others choose to reward strangers they see doing a good deed. Kellogg performs a BԪַkindness challenge,BԪַ asking a stranger for something and returning it in kind.
Many of these strangers are unaware theyBԪַre being filmed. Some creators employ hidden cameras and aim to record subjects in a discreet manner. Kellogg said he wants to be as BԪַsecret about it as possible,BԪַ but asks for consent to share the video after the interaction. Kellogg said most agree because they look BԪַlike a superheroBԪַ after his challenge.
Another charitable content creator, , said he uses a GoPro camera and tries to make recording BԪַextremely noticeable,BԪַ adding, BԪַConsentBԪַs the biggest thing.BԪַ
Regardless of the recording method, some see the process as predatory.
BԪַThese guys always find someone with cancer or always find someone who canBԪַt pay their bills because theyBԪַre stalking through underserved and poor areas and theyBԪַre just sort of waiting,BԪַ Podray said. BԪַLooking through the parking lot like, BԪַHe looks pathetic enoughBԪַ.BԪַ
Karen Hoekstra, the marketing and communications manager for the , studies TikTok-based influencer philanthropy and says the videos, at times, take advantage of their subjects.
BԪַThe model of the man on the street walking up and approaching a stranger and handing them money is BԪַ weBԪַve all heard this phrase, terrible as it is BԪַ it just strikes me as poverty porn,BԪַ Hoekstra said. BԪַItBԪַs exploitation.BԪַ
Calls of exploitation often come when creators feature the same people across multiple videos, especially when they appear to be homeless or have a drug addiction. Liljenquist features some people frequently and maintains that his recurring subjects are like his BԪַbest friends.BԪַ
One user commented on an that recent content feels like Liljenquist is BԪַplaying case worker for views,BԪַ as he posted several videos of a woman who followers suspect is struggling with a drug addiction. He records himself bringing her food, giving her a ride in his Tesla, and asking her questions that often get one-word responses.
Liljenquist said criticism doesnBԪַt bother him because he knows his intentions are good.
BԪַI love these people,BԪַ he said. BԪַThey love me.BԪַ
Lack of checks and balances
Some criticize the showmanship of BԪַkindness content,BԪַ but visibility is crucial to the model that relies heavily on crowdfunding. Kellogg is known to start GoFundMe fundraisers on behalf of his video subjects, usually bringing in tens of thousands of dollars in viewer donations.
Kellogg, Liljenquist and scores of other creators also use their personal accounts on payment apps like Venmo, CashApp or PayPal to accept donations.
Tory Martin, also of the Johnson Center as its director of communications and strategic partnerships, said transparency about donations is BԪַnot an option if itBԪַs just going to an individual.BԪַ
Although these creators arenBԪַt held to standards and regulations like nonprofits, Liljenquist said he feels donor dollars go much further in his hands than in the hands of traditional organizations, which he said are BԪַdesigned for failure.BԪַ
BԪַNonprofits BԪַ not all of them, there are some good ones BԪַ but I would just suggest you do your homework on the nonprofits that you are giving money to because thereBԪַs a good amount of them who take advantage of the system,BԪַ he said.
Some creators have set up nonprofit organizations or foundations to support their work, but that is not a widespread practice.
Podray said he is BԪַ100% sureBԪַ some creators BԪַtake a rake or that thereBԪַs some sort of nonsense going on.BԪַ He also maintains that select creators hand out fake money to cash in on the trend.
Kellogg said seeing fraudulent or exploitative videos is tough for him, worrying, BԪַMy gosh, every Facebook mom just fell for this and thinks itBԪַs real.BԪַ
New wave of philanthropy
While controversy swirls around these videos in some online circles, they are part of a hugely popular social media trend with millions of supporters and thousands who are compelled to donate after watching.
Although Hoekstra has concerns about some creatorsBԪַ methods, she said the introduction to charitable giving these videos make for young people is valuable.
BԪַAnything that can present philanthropy to them in a new way and make it accessible and make it exciting I think is a good thing,BԪַ she said. BԪַObviously, thereBԪַs going to be a learning curve, but I think itBԪַs really exciting to see philanthropy be so accessible and understandable and embraced in these new spaces and in new ways.BԪַ
Some skeptics have become supporters. Kyle Benavidez said he used to see BԪַkindness contentBԪַ on social media and think it was fake. But after his mother was featured in one of and a Kellogg created for her raised over $95,000 to support their family while her husband is in the hospital with cancer, he said KelloggBԪַs online persona is true to his real-life character.
BԪַThereBԪַs a chapel in the hospital and I always go there every morning just to pray. BԪַHopefully something happens.BԪַ And then Jimmy came to our lives,BԪַ Benavidez, 20, said. BԪַItBԪַs like God sent him.BԪַ
Kellogg shows no signs of slowing down his philanthropic work any time soon and rolls out videos across his social platforms almost every day. Still, he says doing good deeds on camera only matters if he and his peers keep it up when the cameras arenBԪַt rolling.
BԪַYou can fool people all day and you can make money and do this and that, but God sees your heart,BԪַ he said.