Hockey Canada says there were more than 900 documented or alleged incidents of on-ice discrimination BԪַ verbal taunts, insults and intimidation BԪַ across all levels and age groups during the 2021-22 season.
The data contained in the national sport organizationBԪַs first-ever report tracking the issue shows 512 penalties for discrimination were called by officials, while 415 allegations were investigated after the fact.
Hockey Canada introduced a new section to its rulebook in August 2021 to address maltreatment in a federation that had close to 520,000 registered players last season.
The 14-page document released Friday details the application of Rule 11.4, which deals specifically with discrimination, including race, language, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity/expression, genetic characteristics and disability.
The reportBԪַs release comes on the heels of the BԪַaction planBԪַ unveiled by Hockey Canada in July to address BԪַtoxic behaviour in the sportBԪַ as it dealt with the dramatic fallout of alleged sexual assaults involving members of both the 2018 and 2003 world junior teams. None of the allegations have been proven in court.
The organization said information released Friday doesnBԪַt reflect off-ice incidents of maltreatment, sexual violence or abuse, which starting this season will be handled by the federal governmentBԪַs Office of the Sport Integrity Commissioner or a new independent third-party complaint process.
BԪַAs this is the first year of reporting, (the data) does not present a comprehensive representation of discrimination in hockey,BԪַ the document read. BԪַWith that in mind, the data contained in this report is a critically important first step in Hockey CanadaBԪַs ongoing efforts to better track, identify and respond to maltreatment in hockey.BԪַ
The organization added BԪַcapacity and readinessBԪַ to collect and report information from its 10 provincial and three territorial members varied.
BԪַEducation, awareness and discussion on processes were necessary in order to make improvements,BԪַ the report stated. BԪַAs a result, there were inconsistencies in the rule application at times.
BԪַLearnings were collected throughout this process and are being built upon for subsequent years.BԪַ
Hockey Canada, which has committed to more transparency following a string of scandals that enraged the public and politicians alike, is picking up the pieces following a horrendous spring, summer and fall that saw its federal and corporate funding paused or halted entirely due to the organizationBԪַs handling of sexual assault allegations and payments to victims.
There were also a series of disastrous heritage committee meetings on Parliament Hill where Hockey Canada officials past and present were grilled by legislators examining the matter, which ultimately led to the board of directorsBԪַ resignation and the departure of embattled president and CEO Scott Smith in October.
Former Supreme Court judge Thomas Cromwell, meanwhile, headed an independent review into Hockey CanadaBԪַs governance. The 221-page report concluded the federation was at a BԪַcrossroadsBԪַ and called for more oversight and accountability.
A vote on a new board and chair by Hockey CanadaBԪַs provincial and territorial members is slated for Dec. 17.
FridayBԪַs report related to on-ice discrimination showed that of the 512 penalties called by officials across the country last season, 61 per cent involved sexual orientation or gender identity, followed by race (18 per cent) and disability (11 per cent).
More than half of those incidents BԪַ 55 per cent BԪַ came in the under-18 age bracket, while 76 per cent occurred at the competitive level.
Players accounted for 96 per cent of the penalties assessed, while male participants made up 99 per cent of infractions.
When it came to allegations that werenBԪַt witnessed by an official and required an investigation, 47 per cent of the reported discrimination was race-related, while 40 per cent concerned sexual orientation or gender identity.
The under-18 age group again led the way with 37 per cent of incidents, while 21 per cent occurred in under-15, and nine per cent in under-13. In 22 per cent of cases, the age division wasnBԪַt provided.
Competitive hockey saw 70 per cent of the allegations, with players making up 76 per cent of the overall number. Male participants accounted for 67 per cent of allegations, while gender wasnBԪַt provided or available in 31 per cent of reports.
Hockey CanadaBԪַs data showed 37 per cent of allegations initially undetected by on-ice officials eventually resulted in an BԪַunsubstantiatedBԪַ ruling, 18 per cent in suspension, 17 per cent in written warnings and 13 per cent in education, while 10 per cent ended with multiple or BԪַotherBԪַ sanctions. Five per cent remain under investigation.
The combined per capita rate of the penalized and alleged discrimination incidents stood at 0.18 per cent among the 519,755 registered players in 2021-22.
The organization said it will push out another report on Rule 11.4 after this season, and is aiming to have all instances of maltreatment, abuse and harassment tracked and shared in 2023-24.
BԪַHockey Canada and its members recognize the inherent importance of data collection,BԪַ the report concluded. BԪַHockey Canada commits to continuing to make national reports on maltreatment publicly available and accessible on an annual basis as part of its overall sport safety framework.BԪַ
BԪַJoshua Clipperton, The Canadian Press