I was disappointed by Mayor Stew YoungB次元官网网址檚 comments, particularly his tone and choice of language. I have been a homeowner in Langford for 15 years (long enough for my opinion to be considered legitimate by Mr. Young?) and certainly do not live in a B次元官网网址�$2 millionB次元官网网址� house B次元官网网址� maybe 30 per cent of that figure.

In regards to the article B次元官网网址淢ayor committed to density to LangfordB次元官网网址檚 core.B次元官网网址�

As the year rolls along and we rapidly barrel towards fall and winter, itB次元官网网址檚 once again time to ponder the start of a new year.

This letter is in regards to the complete lack of concern from Mayor Stew Young and council for residents of the community over the increased development in Langford.

The bulletin board in front of the Lutheran Church on Cedar Hill and Cedar Hill Cross Road recently had the following message: B次元官网网址淭hank you Brian for your gift of music.B次元官网网址�

In regards to the article B次元官网网址淢ayor committed to density to LangfordB次元官网网址檚 core.B次元官网网址� First off, no one is saying we should not have development in Langford.

In response to Mayor Stew YoungB次元官网网址檚 comments in the Aug. 25 Goldstream Gazette calling citizens opposed to development B次元官网网址渘aysayers,B次元官网网址� the citizens in the neighbourhood of the Millstream proposal understand the need for increased density. We have been taxpayers for many years and have contributed to the economy for Langford and deserve a retraction of this statement.

Why are the places that are providing COVID-19 testing charging so much? Why are they allowed to capitalize and gauge the community on this terrible pandemic?

I write to take issue with a letter published in Saanich B次元官网网址 on Aug. 25. The writer asks B次元官网网址渨hy do the mayors of Victoria and Saanich B次元官网网址� claim that increased residential city development actually decreases greenhouse gas emissions?B次元官网网址�

I recently moved from the North Park neighbourhood in Victoria to Royal Oak in Saanich.