What do the nuclear crises in Japan and Chernobyl, and our federal election have in common?
Stephen HarperB´ÎÔª¹ÙÍøÍøÖ·™s administration was responsible for CanadaB´ÎÔª¹ÙÍøÍøÖ·™s Chalk River nuclear facility, which had two MAPLE reactors that were unstable during normal operation plus a 50-year-old reactor that was 20 years beyond its expected lifespan.
On HarperB´ÎÔª¹ÙÍøÍøÖ·™s watch, CanadaB´ÎÔª¹ÙÍøÍøÖ·™s nuclear safety regulator Linda Keen correctly understood that the consequence of operating an unstable reactor could be grave. For example, the Chernobyl nuclear plant B´ÎÔª¹ÙÍøÍøÖ·“ although much larger than ours in Chalk River B´ÎÔª¹ÙÍøÍøÖ·“ had the same critical flaw evident in the MAPLE reactors. When the Chernobyl reactor became uncontrollable, it irradiated half of Eastern Europe. Similarly, JapanB´ÎÔª¹ÙÍøÍøÖ·™s nuclear crisis contaminated the groundwater and sea within 30 kilometres of the plant.
Accordingly, Keen would not license our reactors until properly fixed.
However, HarperB´ÎÔª¹ÙÍøÍøÖ·™s administration would not fund a proper fix. Instead, the Harper administration fired the nuclear safety regulator because she would not license the operation.
A vote for Harper is a vote for poor judgment and personal attacks over responsible management B´ÎÔª¹ÙÍøÍøÖ·“ even in matters of nuclear safety.
Eugene Parks
Victoria