B次元官网网址

Skip to content

B.C. VIEWS: Andrew Wilkinson on taxes, ICBC and union changes

Opposition leader sees unpredictable year ahead in 2019

B.C. legislature columnist Tom FletcherB次元官网网址檚 year-end interview with B.C. Liberal leader Andrew Wilkinson.

TF: Andrew, itB次元官网网址檚 been an eventful year for you. One of the things new party leaders encounter is a struggle to make themselves known to the public. WhatB次元官网网址檚 2018 been like for you?

AW: ItB次元官网网址檚 been a very busy year. I got the leadership job on Feb. 3 this year, and through the summer it was fairly quiet, and in September and October there was the issue of visibility. But once we had the [proportional representation] referendum debate on Nov. 8, that issue seemed to take care of itself. There was a lot more recognition of what was going on, and I was told I did a good job of keeping John Horgan under control and making sure they were telling the truth about this referendum.

TF: Another thing thatB次元官网网址檚 taken place is the transition to personal-only political donations. The last report I saw, the NDP were out-fundraising the B.C. Liberals by two to one. Did you expect that? Is that a problem?

AW: I think we have to remember that in the leadership campaign, the candidates raised almost $4 million amongst them. And thatB次元官网网址檚 the same donor pool that was asked to give to the B.C. Liberal Party.

So itB次元官网网址檚 not surprising that the NDP were outpacing us this year in fundraising, because we were, in the aggregate, beating them three to one if you add in the leadership money. WeB次元官网网址檒l get a more active fundraising campaign going in the very near future. If anything, itB次元官网网址檚 surprising how little the NDP raised. Normally when people are in government thereB次元官网网址檚 enthusiasm to support their efforts, and we sure didnB次元官网网址檛 see that about the NDP. So weB次元官网网址檙e pretty confident things will fall into place in the next year.

TF: Enough politics, on to the policy. YouB次元官网网址檝e talked quite a bit about ending ICBCB次元官网网址檚 monopoly, but IB次元官网网址檓 not quite sure how far youB次元官网网址檙e willing to go there. Does that mean eventually privatizing vehicle insurance completely?

AW: ICBC is a 45-year-old state-run monopoly. Nobody likes it. ItB次元官网网址檚 not doing very well. So the obvious question is why donB次元官网网址檛 we look all around the world at other models. There are only five million people in B.C. and there are 330 million in the U.S. and 30 million other people in Canada. EverybodyB次元官网网址檚 buying auto insurance, so is there a better way to do this?

WeB次元官网网址檝e got to ask hard questions. Is it time to convert it into a co-op or a mutual insurance company thatB次元官网网址檚 owned by the policy holders, and they get some control over it? Is it time to introduce competition? These are very good questions and weB次元官网网址檝e got to get those questions into the public eye, and we do that by comparing best practices around the world, not by carrying on with this monopoly model thatB次元官网网址檚 not working any more.

TF: One of the struggles theyB次元官网网址檙e having, in addition to what seems to be a declining skill of drivers, is the whole ride-hailing discussion. They need a custom insurance package for that. Do you think the existing ICBC can do that?

AW: IB次元官网网址檝e talked to the taxi industry and they tell me that in some circumstances, to start a cab on day one of the year, you pay $37,000 in insurance. And if you only run the cab two days a week because of peak demand on the weekends, youB次元官网网址檙e going to lose money. So clearly we need more flexible insurance products, so we can get the service that people in B.C. want. And it occurred to me, why not open up the taxi market to private competition for insurance? ItB次元官网网址檚 done all over the world.

TF: And phase in competition in the insurance industry, starting there?

AW: Sure. ItB次元官网网址檚 obviously a ripe topic, because people are looking for a better deal in the rides they get, whether itB次元官网网址檚 a taxi or with ride hailing. If the taxi companies can get a better deal on insurance, then the ride hailing people can supposedly get a better deal as well. Flexibility is what the modern worldB次元官网网址檚 about. ItB次元官网网址檚 not about buying insurance for the full year when youB次元官网网址檙e only going to operate the vehicle 10 days a year.

TF: WeB次元官网网址檝e seen a few tax changes this year. What would a B.C. Liberal government do with the speculation tax, the payroll tax to replace Medical Services Plan premiums?

AW: In 15 months, the NDP have introduced 18 new taxes or raised existing taxes. ThatB次元官网网址檚 not good for anybody in B.C., because all it does is transfer assets out of the hands of the public into the hands of government where they supposedly know better what to do with it. WeB次元官网网址檙e very skeptical about that. The people of B.C. are entitled to get value for money and taxes in this province are getting way too high.

The NDP put taxes up by $5.8 billion in the last year, and we have yet to see anything to show for it. So itB次元官网网址檚 time for us to have a complete overhaul of this, starting with the NDP tax increases, and talking about getting rid of things like their phoney speculation tax, which is really just a tax on retirement.

TF: Medical Services Plan brings in a lot of revenue, even as itB次元官网网址檚 being phased out. Is it really practical just eliminate that without replacing the revenue?

AW: The MSP premiums were cut in half by our government in 2017, and we said as the economy grows weB次元官网网址檒l get rid of them all together. Along comes the NDP and basically triples those premiums by adding on the employersB次元官网网址 health tax, which is on top of MSP premiums. So in the coming year, people who pay the tax will pay triple what they paid before. ThatB次元官网网址檚 a big problem.

WeB次元官网网址檙e seeing it in the city of Vancouver where I pay property taxes. My property taxes are going up by hundreds of dollars to pay the employersB次元官网网址 health tax. So itB次元官网网址檚 not like anybodyB次元官网网址檚 getting anything for free. ThereB次元官网网址檚 only one taxpayer, and sooner or later, somebody has to pay these taxes.

TF: One tax the NDP is intending to get rid of, and thatB次元官网网址檚 the liquefied natural gas income tax. That seems significant in terms of having an LNG export project actually proceeding out of Kitimat. Was that a mistake by your government, looking at B次元官网网址渄ebt-free B.C.B次元官网网址 in the last election?

AW: We all remember in 2013 there was a big push by the B.C. Liberals to encourage an LNG industry to develop. A lot of projects came onto the table, and because of market conditions, a lot of them started to slow down from 2016. And we put together a package that served the interests of British Columbians and ensured that prosperity would come if the LNG industry decided to set up here.

Then lo and behold, the NDP decided to cancel a bunch of those programs to make sure they could attract major investors. And we have to understand, the NDP are not exactly investor friendly. They create all kinds of barriers to investment, things like payroll taxes, things that make investors pause. So what they did with the LNG industry was just drop the income tax to nothing to make sure the industry would come here.

They continued the B.C. Liberal program to get an LNG industry to come here, and we wonB次元官网网址檛 know for many years whether they gave away the store to get it.

TF: There was no LNG income tax anywhere else. That was invented here. Are you suggesting the NDP government isnB次元官网网址檛 getting enough out of the resource?

AW: ItB次元官网网址檚 possible the NDP gave too sweet a deal to LNG Canada. We donB次元官网网址檛 know that, but thatB次元官网网址檚 going to have to be examined in the future. Of course the regime has to be competitive. At the same time, we canB次元官网网址檛 give away our resources. WeB次元官网网址檒l have to look at that as time goes by.

TF: Labour legislation changes. WeB次元官网网址檝e seen the NDP make what they say is a significant reform to what went before, and that is the flipping of senior care contracts, allowing them to get out of a union contract by reincorporating. Was that a mistake by the previous government?

AW: When this change came through about labour agreements in care homes, it was surprising how there was no real concern about it. Both the providers and the unions said, B次元官网网址極h yeah, that makes some sense. LetB次元官网网址檚 carry on.B次元官网网址 So it became completely non-controversial.

I think the bigger issue that we have is that the NDP are proving to be excessively union friendly in things like their supposed community benefits agreement, which is really a union bosses benefit agreement, where they have cut a deal with only 19 of the many construction unions and said, B次元官网网址榊ouB次元官网网址檙e our friends. We will reward you and make sure that major projects are only run by your union members.B次元官网网址 Whereas the other union members and the non-union members are completely cut out.

So the NDP basically said to 85 per cent of construction workers, B次元官网网址榊ouB次元官网网址檙e not welcome, youB次元官网网址檙e not our friends,B次元官网网址 the people who donated to the NDP in the past, and now they get a sweet deal.

TF: What are the cost implications for something like the Port Mann Bridge or the widening of Highway 1 in the Interior?

AW: It doesnB次元官网网址檛 sound like a big percentage, but seven per cent of $1 billion is $70 million thatB次元官网网址檚 being handed off to the union bosses. ThatB次元官网网址檚 a big problem. So on the Pattullo Bridge, which goes between Surrey and New Westminster, the on-ramps at the south side, weB次元官网网址檙e told thatB次元官网网址檚 not part of the deal any more because they canB次元官网网址檛 afford it. ThatB次元官网网址檚 being dumped onto the City of Surrey.

And if you do the math you say, wait a second, the cost of the on-ramps is what you gave to the union bosses. So what weB次元官网网址檙e going to see is fewer projects will be built at increased costs because the budget is going to get used up by sweetheart deals for the NDPB次元官网网址檚 friends.

TF: What about the local hiring restrictions there? That seems on the face of it to be a good thing, that people are hired locally before theyB次元官网网址檙e hired from further out.

AW: ItB次元官网网址檚 a small-minded approach. Construction workers in heavy industry in B.C. are used to working all over the place. They go to Alberta regularly to get work. So to tell people that they have to live within 100 km of where the project is, is really an arbitrary, government-created rule. If youB次元官网网址檙e a crane operator and thereB次元官网网址檚 no operator locally, theyB次元官网网址檙e going to have to find you anyway.

We heard immediately from aboriginal construction companies, who said B次元官网网址榃ait a second. WeB次元官网网址檝e been working hard to get our place established in the economy.B次元官网网址 Generally the aboriginal people are based in more remote areas like around Shuswap Lake, and they were saying theyB次元官网网址檙e going to get cut out of these highway projects because they donB次元官网网址檛 live 100 km away. ThatB次元官网网址檚 just not fair. ItB次元官网网址檚 an hour drive.

TF: WeB次元官网网址檝e had a relatively unstable minority government here. Do you think there is a chance of an election in 2019?

AW: WeB次元官网网址檝e had votes in the house that were tied recently. That means itB次元官网网址檚 a pretty unstable situation. WeB次元官网网址檝e got all this chaos going on in the SpeakerB次元官网网址檚 office, and we have the Nanaimo by-election coming up. So anything could happen in 2019, and we will be ready.

Tom Fletcher is B.C. legislature reporter and columnist for Black Press Media. Email: tfletcher@blackpress.ca



tfletcher@blackpress.ca

Like us on and follow us on .





(or

B次元官网网址

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }