BԪַ

Skip to content

Scheer urges PM to follow through on libel threat over SNC, testify in court

Scheer revealed he received a letter on March 31 from TrudeauBԪַs lawyer threatening a libel suit

Andrew Scheer is challenging Justin Trudeau to follow through on a threat to sue him over his assertion that the prime minister politically interfered with the criminal prosecution of Montreal engineering giant SNC-Lavlin.

The Conservative leader revealed Sunday that he received a letter on March 31 from TrudeauBԪַs lawyer, Julian Porter, threatening a libel suit.

READ MORE:

BԪַIf Mr. Trudeau believes he has a case against me, I urge him to follow through on his threat immediately,BԪַ Scheer said in a statement.

BԪַCanadians want this scandal to be investigated in a legal setting where Liberals do not control the proceedings.BԪַ

Scheer said he looks forward to Trudeau testifying under oath in open court.

He called the threatened lawsuit BԪַan intimidation tacticBԪַ aimed at silencing the Conservatives, who have been demanding a thorough, independent investigation of the affair. ItBԪַs the same kind of tactic Trudeau has employed to silence former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould, said Scheer.

BԪַThis is what Justin Trudeau does when you stand up to him. He threatens you.BԪַ

Like Wilson-Raybould, Scheer added: BԪַWe will not back down. We will continue to do our jobs, hold him to account and get to the bottom of this.BԪַ

Wilson-Raybould maintains she was inappropriately pressured last fall by the Prime MinisterBԪַs Office to stop criminal proceedings against SNC-Lavalin on bribery charges related to contracts in Libya. She believes she was moved to Veterans Affairs in a mid-January cabinet shuffle as punishment for refusing to do so. She resigned from cabinet a month later.

While she has called the pressure improper, Wilson-Raybould has said she doesnBԪַt believe anything illegal occurred.

Last week, Trudeau expelled both Wilson-Raybould and fellow former cabinet minister Jane Philpott from the Liberal caucus. Philpott had resigned from cabinet in early March, citing a loss of confidence in the governmentBԪַs handling of the SNC-Lavalin case.

At issue in the threatened libel suit is a statement Scheer issued on March 29, in which he said documentation provided by Wilson-Raybould to the House of Commons justice committee BԪַ including a surreptitiously recorded phone conversation with the clerk of the Privy Council, Michael Wernick BԪַ is BԪַconcrete evidence that proves Justin Trudeau led a campaign to politically interfere with SNC-LavalinBԪַs criminal prosecution.BԪַ

Porter called the statement BԪַhighly defamatory.BԪַ

BԪַThe prime minister supports wide-ranging and vigorous political debate on matters of public policy,BԪַ he said in his letter to Scheer. BԪַHowever, your statement, in its entirety, is beyond the pale of fair debate and is libellous of my client personally and in the way of his occupation as prime minister.BԪַ

Porter said itBԪַs BԪַentirely falseBԪַ to say Trudeau interfered in the SNC prosecution, which has not been halted, or that he personally directed Wilson-Raybould to BԪַbreak the lawBԪַ and BԪַfiredBԪַ her when she refused. ItBԪַs also entirely false to suggest Trudeau was aware of Wilson-RaybouldBԪַs concern that he was politically interfering in the SNC case but lied to Canadians about it, Porter said.

ScheerBԪַs statement that the affair amounts to BԪַcorruption on top of corruption on top of corruptionBԪַ was meant to suggest that Trudeau BԪַhad engaged in dishonest and corrupt conduct that would contravene the Criminal Code,BԪַ a crime deserving of up to 14 years in prison, Porter said. That too was BԪַentirely false.BԪַ

In response, ScheerBԪַs lawyer, Peter Downard, wrote back Sunday that Scheer BԪַwill not be intimidatedBԪַ and is simply performing his BԪַconstitutional dutyBԪַ to hold the government to account.

If Trudeau is serious about suing, Downard said he must immediately take steps to preserve all relevant documents and to notify all members of his government, past and present, whoBԪַve been involved in the SNC-Lavalin matter that they can expect to be called to testify.

If Trudeau does not proceed with the threatened lawsuit, Downard said Scheer will conclude that Trudeau BԪַhas properly acknowledged that Mr. ScheerBԪַs statements were appropriate and grounded in evidence before the Canadian people.BԪַ

Joan Bryden , The Canadian Press

Like us on and follow us on Twitter





(or

BԪַ

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }