A private medical clinic that launched an unsuccessful constitutional challenge of CanadaBԪַs public health care system must pay the B.C. governmentBԪַs legal costs, after what a judge calls a BԪַgruelling marathonBԪַ of a case.
Cambie Surgeries Corp. launched a lawsuit back in 2009, claiming B.C.BԪַs Medicare Protection Act was unconstitutionally preventing people from getting private health care when the public system was unable to provide it.
The B.C. Supreme Court, the B.C. Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada all shot down the private surgery clinicBԪַs case, but the issue of trial costs was left in the air.
B.C. Supreme Court Justice Jennifer Lynn Whately ruled Monday that Cambie Surgeries should pay the Attorney General of British ColumbiaBԪַs trial costs, calling the long-running litigation BԪַprodigiously lengthy and complex.BԪַ
The ruling says the lawsuit by Cambie Surgeries was being funded by the Canadian Constitution Foundation.
The ruling doesnBԪַt specify the provinceBԪַs costs, but the foundation said last year the B.C. government was seeking $1.7 million from the charitable foundation and BԪַits partners.BԪַ
The court ruling says the government argued that Cambie Surgeries was a BԪַwell-resourcedBԪַ party that had a financial stake in the outcome of the case, rather than a public-interest litigant going to bat for patients let down by the public health care system.
It says the B.C. government claimed the private clinic was making BԪַtens of millionsBԪַ in profit by violating the public health care protection law.
The judge found that Cambie SurgeriesBԪַ financial interest in winning the case BԪַlikely preclude them from being considered true public interest litigants.BԪַ
Whately found that the case BԪַinvolved matters of great importance to all British Columbians, not only in a legal sense, but in terms of the practical, day-to-day impact on access to health care, the funding of health care services, and the principles that uphold our public health care system.BԪַ
The private clinic said the case involved BԪַnovelBԪַ legal issues and assessing the BԪַgovernmentBԪַs constitutional obligations to provide public health care within a reasonable time, and the BԪַpractical consequencesBԪַ that must be associated to the failure to do so.BԪַ
Both sides tried to blame one another for the case dragging on, with the Attorney General of B.C. citing BԪַegregiousBԪַ conduct around document disclosure, experts and witnesses while pursuing a meritless claim under the Charter.
Cambie Surgeries and the other plaintiffs, on the other hand, said the B.C. government had its BԪַown BԪַmassiveBԪַ shortcomings in document disclosure and production, and that it derailed the litigation process.
The case eventually went to trial in 2016 and spanned four years before the B.C. Supreme Court ruled against Cambie Surgeries. That decision was upheld by the B.C. Court of Appeal, before the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave for a further appeal.
Neither the Attorney GeneralBԪַs office nor clinic owner Dr. Brian Day immediately responded to a request for comment on the ruling.