Supreme Court Justice Russell Brown continues to insist he did nothing wrong prior to an alleged altercation in Arizona that triggered a complaint to the Canadian Judicial Council.
A lawyer for Brown says the justice has nothing to add after a police report alleged BԪַunwanted touchingBԪַ of a female guest during a Jan. 28 encounter at a Scottsdale resort lounge.
That report included the complainant, Jon Crump, accusing Brown of being intoxicated and BԪַhitting onBԪַ his female companions before he punched the justice BԪַa few timesBԪַ in the face.
One of those companions told police Brown kissed her on the cheek BԪַonce or twice,BԪַ placed his hand on the small of her back and touched her on the leg.
The police report says she denied being touched in a BԪַsexual wayBԪַ but answered BԪַyesBԪַ when the officer asked if BrownBԪַs alleged behaviour constituted BԪַunwanted touching.BԪַ
In a statement Friday, Brown described CrumpBԪַs version of events BԪַdemonstrably falseBԪַ but did not specifically address the womanBԪַs allegations.
BԪַJustice Brown has nothing to add to his statement of March 10,BԪַ Alexandra Heine, who is one of BrownBԪַs lawyers, wrote in a statement Tuesday.
BԪַThe evidence provided to the Canadian Judicial Council confirms his account of the incident.BԪַ
Brown, who was appointed to the Supreme Court in 2015 by then-prime minister Stephen Harper, has been on leave from the court since Feb. 1 pending the outcome of the councilBԪַs ongoing investigation.
He was taking part in an awards ceremony and banquet at the resort ahead of the encounter, which occurred in the hotel lounge later that same night.
The police report said that at the invitation of one of the women, Brown joined their group and spent a portion of the evening with them. It was during that period the BԪַunwanted touchingBԪַ allegedly occurred.
Crump told the investigating officer that when the groupBԪַs members later tried to return to their hotel rooms, Brown followed, despite CrumpBԪַs efforts to tell him he was unwelcome and to stop following them.
BԪַOnce they got to their hotel room all the females walked inside, followed by Crump, then followed by (Brown),BԪַ the officer wrote.
BԪַHowever, to protect the women and to prevent the drunk, creepy, unwanted male from entering the hotel room uninvited, Crump punched (Brown) a few times.BԪַ
The police report said Crump was BԪַargumentative, hostile (and) antagonisticBԪַ during his interview with the officer, who wrote he believed that he was BԪַunder the influence of alcohol.BԪַ
It also said the officer was unable to reach Brown to interview him, but he concluded CrumpBԪַs BԪַuse of force appeared reasonable and necessary, and no crime was determined.BԪַ There were no arrests.
Neither Crump nor other members of the group identified in the media report immediately responded to requests for comment on Tuesday.
Details of the altercation have emerged as Parliament considers new legislation designed to change the process by which the council handles allegations against judges.
If passed, Bill C-9 would create a new process for reviewing allegations of misconduct that are not serious enough to warrant a judgeBԪַs removal.
The bill, which is currently being considered by the Senate, would also clarify the circumstances under which a judge can be removed, and change the way the council reports its recommendations to the federal justice minister.
The Canadian Judicial Council has authority over federally appointed judges and it receives, reviews and deals with complaints. It works at armBԪַs length from the executive and legislative branches of government.