BԪַ

Skip to content

Kelowna court case just one of hundreds across Canada halted by time limits

Jordan ruling imposes 18-month BԪַpresumptive ceilingBԪַ between charge, end of trial in provincial court
web1_2024110719118-20241106181112-7c8da2344ef6a0ed00d8fbe673507205e6670129d9316ec8b8b626cbe1812fb0
Cait Alexander, Founder of End Violence Everywhere, poses for a portrait after appearing as a witness at a House of Commons standing committee the Status of Women (FEWO) in Ottawa on Monday, Oct. 28, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

When police turned up at Melanie HattonBԪַs home in Kelowna, B.C., in November 2021, she says they found her in the bathroom covered in blood, with her then-husband Jeffrey Maclean standing over her BԪַin an aggressive manner.BԪַ

She describes a gruesome scene in a court filing, with blood from her head wound allegedly smeared on MacleanBԪַs mouth from his whispering in her ear. The filing in a civil lawsuit against Maclean says he told a 911 operator his wife was BԪַbleeding like a pig.BԪַ

Hatton said police and prosecutors told her that the criminal case against Maclean in B.C. Supreme Court would be a BԪַslam dunk,BԪַ and he was charged with assault causing bodily harm and resisting arrest.

But the case was thrown out in August 2023 BԪַ not for a lack of evidence, but because the Crown took too long to bring it to trial under a set of strict timelines that have reshaped the way criminal cases are handled since a landmark 2016 ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada.

READ MORE:

Supporters say the so-called Jordan ruling has sped up proceedings and strengthened Charter rights for prompt justice.

But the legacy of Jordan is mixed, and some victims say the time limits work in criminalsBԪַ favour. Eight years into the rules, cases continue to collapse because the time limits are breached, although these represent a small fraction of all cases.

A review of statistics provided by provinces and territories shows that since the beginning of last year, more than 400 criminal cases countrywide have been dismissed, stayed or withdrawn as a result of Jordan challenges.

Among the defendants were some accused of sexual assault, child exploitation, fraud and drug trafficking; murder cases have also been thrown out in previous years.

The case against Maclean was among those dropped.

Hatton said she was thrown into BԪַan absolute pit of despair and shameBԪַ after the case was thrown out.

Prosecutors blamed factors including COVID-19 and the availability of MacleanBԪַs lawyer for the delays and the failure of the case.

Hatton thought otherwise, and sent a one-line email to the Crown prosecutor.

BԪַI said BԪַthis is on you,BԪַBԪַ said Hatton, who now lives in Ontario with the coupleBԪַs two children.

None of the allegations in HattonBԪַs civil suit against Maclean have been proven or tested in court, and in his response, Maclean BԪַdenies each and every allegation.BԪַ

A BԪַREVOLUTIONARYBԪַ RULING

The Jordan ruling imposed BԪַa presumptive ceilingBԪַ of 18 months between charge and the actual or anticipated end of a trial in provincial court, and 30 months in superior courts.

Barring BԪַexceptional circumstances,BԪַ exceeding those limits was deemed by the countryBԪַs top court to breach the Canadian Charter, which requires that criminal defendants BԪַbe tried within a reasonable time.BԪַ

Exactly how long BԪַreasonableBԪַ meant was unclear until the high courtBԪַs ruling in R. V. Jordan.

The case would upend criminal law practice countrywide, but B.C. lawyer Tony Paisana, who was involved in the trial, didnBԪַt know just how significant it would be at the time.

BԪַLooking back, itBԪַs certainly difficult to say that we, any of us, really expected this to come out the way that it did and how revolutionary it was going to be,BԪַ he said in an interview.

The case started modestly enough in December 2008 with the arrest of an alleged drug dealer named Barrett Jordan in Langley, B.C., along with a number of others who police accused of running a BԪַdial-a-dopeBԪַ operation.

It took more than four years from Jordan being charged to the end of his original trial.

He unsuccessfully argued that his Charter rights to a timely trial had been breached in both the B.C. Supreme Court and Court of Appeal before it ended up in the Supreme Court of Canada.

Paisana and colleagues Eric Gottardi and Richard Peck argued that the right to a timely trial went back hundreds of years, quoting the 1215 Magna Carta in their submissions.

Paisana said the high courtBԪַs decision in Jordan BԪַcompletely achieved its intended objective, which was to speed up criminal trials.BԪַ

BԪַAnd to have various judicial participants, that being the judge, the Crown, the defence, the accused, everyone start paying attention to the timeliness of trials,BԪַ he said.

BԪַIt was a chronic problem that existed in our system and Jordan was what we call in the law a BԪַclarion callBԪַ to change the culture that surrounded criminal trials.BԪַ

He said cases were stayed for unreasonable delays before this case, but Jordan established new thresholds.

BԪַThereBԪַs just a greater confidence in the justice system when things are resolved more quickly,BԪַ he said. BԪַI think itBԪַs a net positive effect that the judgmentBԪַs had. ItBԪַs not without its controversy, but nothing that we do is without its controversy, frankly.BԪַ

The debate over Jordan was reignited in B.C. this summer, after a case was dismissed against a man accused of molesting a six-year-old.

Premier David Eby said at the time it was due to a BԪַperfect stormBԪַ of delays, and that BԪַnot one case should be dismissed this way.BԪַ

The Jordan deadlines, he said, had been BԪַvery restrictiveBԪַ and BԪַdevastating in other provinces.BԪַ

Among at least 409 Jordan challenges that ended cases across Canada since the start of last year were 26 in B.C., involving allegations ranging from fraud, to theft, drug and weapons offences, and sexual assault.

BԪַEvery case that is judicially stayed due to delay is a concern. Victims and the public expect to see cases determined on their merits and not dismissed because of unreasonable delay,BԪַ the B.C. Ministry of Attorney General said in a statement.

BԪַWe have taken this issue seriously and invested in transforming processes and increasing resources to prevent judicial stays,BԪַ the statement said.

In MacleanBԪַs case, the B.C. Supreme Court found in August 2023 that his trial had been set BԪַwell beyond the Jordan limits,BԪַ through no fault of the defence, nor any delay caused by COVID-19 interruptions of court operations.

BԪַIf the Crown had not failed in its disclosure obligations,BԪַ the judge wrote, BԪַthe matter would have likely concluded within the Jordan limits.BԪַ

BԪַA HUGE NEGATIVE IMPACTBԪַ

Stacey Purser, a criminal defence lawyer in Edmonton, said Jordan had not resulted in the BԪַculture of urgency that I think the Supreme Court was trying to create.BԪַ

BԪַUnfortunately, I donBԪַt think that much really has changed since Jordan other than to say that, you know, once you get past those presumptive deadlines, people seem to be in quite a panic to get things done,BԪַ she said.

Vancouver defence lawyer Kyla Lee, who specializes in impaired driving cases, said Jordan has had a BԪַhuge negative impact on not just my practice, but the practice of law generally for criminal lawyers.BԪַ

BԪַThe problem is that now every time you go to court, no matter what the purpose of the appearance is, there is always a discussion about Jordan,BԪַ she said. BԪַIt comes up at every single appearance and itBԪַs gotten to the point where the ceilings in Jordan are effectively being weaponized against accused individuals.BԪַ

With a busy schedule, finding court dates that work for both her and prosecutors is challenging, and the inability to agree results in arguments over whoBԪַs to blame. Judges have to conduct BԪַmicroscopic analysisBԪַ to determine the length and cause of trial delays, Lee said.

BԪַIt has made everything far more complex, far more contentious, and itBԪַs really done a disservice to the timely administration of justice because more court time is being taken up simply to address these issues,BԪַ she said.

Former Toronto resident Cait Alexander, a Canadian model and actress now living in Los Angeles, founded the group End Violence Everywhere after an abusive relationship nearly ended her life, alleging her ex-partner brutally beat her with a wooden rolling pin in July 2021.

Multiple charges were stayed due to delays, and Alexander said she felt BԪַdisgustingBԪַ after having received assurances from prosecutors that the case would go ahead.

She said the only consequence against her ex-boyfriend BԪַ who was originally charged with assault causing bodily harm, uttering threats, obstruction and other offences BԪַ was a peace bond, and she left the country in fear of her safety.

BԪַThatBԪַs all they could offer me because they didnBԪַt have time to prosecute my case,BԪַ she said.

Alexander testified before the House of Commons Standing Committee on the Status of Women this past July, recounting stories of survivors including Hatton, whose experience she called BԪַharrowingly similarBԪַ to her own.

In her testimony, Alexander told members of the committee that the BԪַgovernment doesnBԪַt careBԪַ about survivors and victims of intimate partner violence.

BԪַWe, as Canadians, have Charter rights that are essentially a BԪַget out of jail freeBԪַ card for criminals, but what about survivorsBԪַ rights? Why are our Charter rights never accounted for?,BԪַ she testified.

Like Hatton, sheBԪַs suing her ex-boyfriend because itBԪַs BԪַthe only form of legal justice I have left,BԪַ she told the committee.

Alexander testified to the committee again last week, telling members that Jordan timelines shouldnBԪַt apply in cases of sexual assault or intimate partner violence.

BԪַThere should be no time limit or stay permitted with human-on-human crimes,BԪַ she testified, later tearfully describing the Jordan rules as BԪַsickeningBԪַ and BԪַterrifying.BԪַ

Paisana said it was important to keep in mind the BԪַbigger pictureBԪַ of Jordan, the importance of timely trials and the rights of accused persons who are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

BԪַIt benefits society as a whole in a very dramatic way, as opposed to one or two individual cases in a given a year, in a given jurisdiction, that might be stayed as a result of it,BԪַ he said.

For Hatton, the collapse of the case against her ex-husband was devastating, and continues to influence her life. She now has multiple security systems in her new home after fleeing her old life in B.C.

In October 2023, Hatton filed her civil lawsuit against Maclean in B.C. Supreme Court, alleging a BԪַhistory of abuseBԪַ throughout their relationship, seeking damages for assault, intentional infliction of emotional distress and defamation.

READ MORE:

READ MORE:

She said getting a relocation order allowing her to move out of B.C. with her children is a BԪַslight bit of justice.BԪַ

But she now lives in a state of hyper vigilance.

BԪַI sleep with a golf club beside my bed,BԪַ she said.

Darryl Greer, The Canadian Press

Breaking BԪַ You Need To Know

Sign up for a free account today and start receiving our exclusive newsletters.

Sign Up with google Sign Up with facebook

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and apply.

Reset your password

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and apply.

A link has been emailed to you - check your inbox.



Don't have an account? Click here to sign up




(or

BԪַ

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }