An award-winning chef who ended up shuttering his Victoria catering company considered the biggest in the city in February 2023 has won his court case after being sued by a couple who hired the firm to do their wedding.

But the ruling by the B.C. Civil Resolution Tribunal left the door open to the case being refiled.

The applicants, Megan Hopkins and Ryan Feltham, said they hired Nicholas Waters, owner and chef at VictoriaB次元官网网址檚 Toque Catering Inc., to provide catering for their June 25, 2022 wedding.

The applicants said in the CRT filing that they received B次元官网网址減oor serviceB次元官网网址� and asked for a $4,149.66 refund.

B次元官网网址淭hey say the respondent failed to perform the services outlined in their contract to an acceptable standard,B次元官网网址� reads the CRT ruling. B次元官网网址淭hey point to multiple issues including undercooked and cold food, delayed and missing courses, and poor service from catering staff. The applicants say they are entitled to a refund for services the respondent failed to provide.B次元官网网址�

Waters responded that the deposit by the applicants was non-refundable according to the contract, said the CRT ruling.

The closure of Toque was controversial at the time as some people who booked the company wanted a return of their deposits for future events.

The CRT ruling said that the case was being dismissed because the applicants had named Waters personally, instead of Toque.

B次元官网网址淎 longstanding principle in law is that a corporation is a separate legal entity that can enter into contracts, independent from its shareholders, officers, or employees,B次元官网网址� said the ruling. B次元官网网址淚 find it clear from the evidence submitted that the applicants contracted with the respondentB次元官网网址檚 corporation, Toque Catering Inc. (Toque), and not the respondent personally. While the partiesB次元官网网址� contract is not in evidence, the applicants are seeking a refund from an invoice issued by Toque. Toque also appears in the respondentB次元官网网址檚 email signature which lists him as the executive chef and director of the corporation.B次元官网网址�

READ MORE:

B次元官网网址淭he applicants admit that they hired Toque rather than the respondent,B次元官网网址� reads the CRT ruling. B次元官网网址淎s the applicants contracted with Toque, I find the applicants have no legal right to claim a refund under the contract from the respondent. So, I must dismiss the applicantsB次元官网网址� claim on this basis. I make no findings about whether Toque is liable to the applicants for the poor service they received at their wedding. Nothing in this decision prevents the applicants from filing a claim against Toque, subject to any applicable limitation period.B次元官网网址�

READ MORE: