North SaanichB次元官网网址檚 review of its Official Community Plan will not only include housing and affordability, but also aspects previously considered too controversial for inclusion.
Council on Monday passed a series of motions promising to produce a more complete review by giving the public a chance to comment on all the elements through channels including in-person engagement.
The Feb. 14 vote was a flip-flop from councilB次元官网网址檚 previous decision asking staff to start drafting the document without consideration of housing and affordability as a way to resume , a solution soon wanting by councillors themselves, including Coun. Patricia Pearson, who proposed four motions designed to resume public consultations inclusive housing and affordability before drafting.
While these motions sought to retain housing and affordability in the OCP process by removing elements that had caused controversy in the past from public engagement, the nine main motions passed Monday mean that these elements will be part of the next round of public consultations with staff said to spell out an engagement schedule and budget implications next month among other steps.
Mayor Geoff Orr said not only is most of council not prepared to stop the process and leave it for the next council, they are confident the consultant handling the review will be able to engage the community and present a summary to council before the fall election.
B次元官网网址淣othing seems to satisfy the various groups, so (it comes down to) what do we think is best?B次元官网网址漵aid. B次元官网网址淒o we think that as a community we can do an OCP review and should we able to do that? The answer is B次元官网网址榶esB次元官网网址� and this will allow the community to demonstrate whether they are able to follow the process or not.B次元官网网址�
RELATED:
District staff had warned against excluding housing and affordability from the review, and the new ask by council spells out specific steps around community engagement.
B次元官网网址淲e specifically said who we wanted to interview and we also explicitly said that this engagement does not need to include other agencies or the other stakeholders, (such as) outfits like UDI (Urban Development Institute),B次元官网网址� Orr said.
Groups specifically singled out for engagement include four local residents associations, the Save North Saanich group, and residents in the Terraces neighbourhood and McTavish Road and Ardmore Drive areas.
Engagement will likely happen in May and June, a hoped-for period of declining COVID-19 case numbers. B次元官网网址淚t still not an ideal situation, but we felt it is enough to get feedback and still move forward,B次元官网网址� Orr said. B次元官网网址淲e are hoping that it help us.B次元官网网址�
Coun. Jack McClintock, who previously called for ending the process, said in its ongoing involvement review consultant MODUS has not met the standard of community trust. B次元官网网址淚 donB次元官网网址檛 know how we can overcome that in the current format,B次元官网网址� he said.
McClintock was the lone voice of opposition on three approved motions, including one of two that dealt with engagement. He and Coun. Celia Stock opposed an amended motion to remove controversial housing elements.
RELATED:
Former mayor Alice Finall also criticized councilB次元官网网址檚 decision. While she agreed with limiting engagement to local groups, she echoed McClintockB次元官网网址檚 concerns over the consultantB次元官网网址檚 work.
B次元官网网址淭hey are proposing an engagement plan that was really a repetition of the one that has already failed, quite badly,B次元官网网址� she said.
Pushing ahead with a more fulsome review following months of community discussions around the best way forward is not a sign of strength by council, she noted. B次元官网网址淭hat is the route we have been going on for the last year-and-a-half. All they have done is sink back to an overview that is not acceptable, in my view, to the majority of the community.B次元官网网址�
She explained her view by pointing to the large volume of largely critical letters, as well as the protest that took place outside of council chambers on July 12.
B次元官网网址淚f I had up to 500 responses to council indicating that residents did not believe the (current) direction was in the interest of the community, I would have listened. But clearly the consultants and what I perceive to be a fairly confused council has moved back there.B次元官网网址�
Do you have a story tip? Email: vnc.editorial@blackpress.ca.
Follow us on and and like us on
