BԪַ

Skip to content

Holocaust denier leads meeting in Sidney

Last FridayBԪַs event not publicized to avoid protesters
15313595_web1_190128PNRFarRightSecretMeetingsSidney

Controversial far-right figures Paul Fromm and Monika Schaefer were in Sidney on Friday, Jan. 25, for a fundraising and speaking engagement, as part of a discrete 11-stop, cross-country tour.

Schaefer is a former Green Party candidate from Alberta, who recently served a 10-month sentence in Germany for Holocaust denial, which is classed as a hate crime there.

Fromm is one of CanadaBԪַs most prominent far-right figures and the executive director of the group who organized the tour BԪַ the Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFE).

Fromm describes himself as a conservative, but his ideology has been labelled BԪַneo-NaziBԪַ by the Southern Poverty Law Centre, which monitors extremists in North America.

The main topics of the lecture in Sidney regarded SchaeferBԪַs experiences in prison, freedom of speech and her political beliefs. Wary of disruption by potential protesters and to maintain discretion, the talk was not advertised and attendees were invited through CAFEBԪַs subscription newsletter and email service. It is believed between six and 12 people attended.

Schaefer has visited the Saanich Peninsula before for her political activities and a meeting with supporters was cancelled with short notice on June 18, 2016.

Gordon Watson, a local supporter, said the venue cancelled that talk the day before, once it discovered who would be speaking. When attendees turned up on the day of the talk, they were turned away by officers from the Central Saanich Police Department and RCMP.

Since then, Schaefer has made three trips to Victoria and the Saanich Peninsula to meet with supporters. Schaefer, who has talked openly of her admiration for Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany, now styles herself as a free-speech activist who believes no topic should be off-limits in public discourse, no matter if it can be interpreted as hateful.

Germany is not alone in placing restrictions on speech. CanadaBԪַs Human Rights Act and Criminal Code designate hate speech as a prosecutable crime and individuals have been convicted, going back as far as the in 1990.

Regarding BԪַhatredBԪַ, former Supreme Court Justice Marshall Rothstein wrote in 2013 that, BԪַIn my view, BԪַdetestationBԪַ and BԪַvilificationBԪַ aptly describe the harmful effect that the Code seeks to eliminate.BԪַ

Fromm and Schaefer dispute that their ideas are hateful and are convinced Canadian society is in an BԪַexistential struggleBԪַ that is BԪַat war without the bombs.BԪַ They claim they are peaceful activists and do not seek physical confrontation. However, Fromm warns that if groups like CAFE are restricted in expressing their views, more extreme elements might take their place.

BԪַWhen you silence the man with the pen, you make way for the man with the sword,BԪַ he said.

Schaefer agreed, BԪַthey force you to, in the end, not me personally, but in the end that is whatBԪַs going to happen.BԪַ

Schaefer said she received 1,250 letters from supporters around the world while in jail and that her anti-Semitic beliefs in hidden global conspiracies have BԪַhardenedBԪַ since her release, and she now considers her current and future activism as her lifeBԪַs work.

Central Saanich Police Deputy Chief Derren Lench said if officers received information that a talk that breached the Civil Code was happening they would, BԪַinvestigate it like any criminal offence and whether it was a potential hate crime.BԪַ

He added, they would then work together with different agencies and decide how to proceed.

nick.murray@peninsulanewsreview.com

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter




(or

BԪַ

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }