A longstanding dispute over the operation of a local business has been resolved in the District of SookeB次元官网网址檚 favour by the B.C. Supreme Court.
The court action arose from the District of SookeB次元官网网址檚 claim that the use of the property at 5536 Sooke Rd. violated the Local Government Act and local bylaws.
The defendants, Shawn Driver and Driver Enterprises, have used the property to operate a welding, fabrication, and vehicle repair business shortly after Driver bought the approximately one-hectare property in September 2000.
Driver Enterprises has since added painting services, used car sales, auto parts sales, and merchandising. Some of the buildings on the property when Driver bought it have been expanded without the necessary permits, as well as a large steel building connected to the original barn.
The district argued that Driver Enterprises contravened several bylaws, including zoning, and undertook development without a valid permit.
RELATED: Sooke sues business over zoning issues
B次元官网网址淭he zoning of the property is and was, at all material times, restricted to residential and agricultural uses,B次元官网网址 Justice Gordon Weatherill said in his ruling on Jan. 10.
Driver argued that although he doesnB次元官网网址檛 reside on the property, he lives next to it, so his business operation should be permitted not only as a non-conforming use under the Local Government Act but also as a home-based business under the zoning bylaw.
He also argued that the district is prevented from enforcing its bylaws because it allowed the business to operate for almost 20 years.
Weatherill said he understood the defendantsB次元官网网址 position to be that they should be exempted from compliance with the zoning bylaw because the plaintiff allowed them to operate the business for many years without challenge, even engaging their services on various occasions over the years.
Weatherill said, however, that the law is clear that the rights, duties and powers of a municipality, including the duties to carry out the provisions of a statute, B次元官网网址渁re of such a public nature that they cannot be waived, limited, or vitiated by mere acquiescence, laches, or estoppel. Once a clear breach of a bylaw has been established, the court has little discretion to disallow the enforcement of a bylaw regardless of such acquiescence.B次元官网网址
Weatherill decided that the district had established a clear breach by the defendants with regard to the zoning, business license, and building permit bylaws.
After hearing both parties submissions, Weatherill ruled that the district has been B次元官网网址渟ubstantiallyB次元官网网址 successful, and is entitled to its costs.
VIDEO:
news@sookenewsmirror.com
Like us on and follow us on