Hurricane Otis turned from mild to monster in record time, and scientists are struggling to figure out how BԪַ and why they didnBԪַt see it coming.
Usually reliable computer models and the forecasters who use them didnBԪַt predict OtisBԪַ explosive intensification, creating a nightmare scenario of an unexpectedly strong storm striking at night. At least 27 people are dead and four missing in the destruction along MexicoBԪַs Pacific coast, with devastation that extends for miles.
All this after Acapulco was told to expect a tropical storm just below hurricane strength. Just 24 hours later, Otis blasted ashore with 165 mph (266 kph) winds, the strongest landfall of any East Pacific hurricane.
In just 12 hours, OtisBԪַ strength more than doubled from 70 mph (113 kph) winds to 160 mph (257 kph), also a record, as it neared the coast. And it got even stronger before it struck. Storms typically gain or lose a few miles per hour in 12 hours, though some outliers gain 30 to 50 mph (48 to 80 kph) in a day.
What happened with Otis was just plain nuts, said University of Miami hurricane researcher Brian McNoldy. But it coincides with a documented trend of because of warmer water connected to , scientists said.
Five different hurricane experts told The Associated Press they werenBԪַt quite sure what set Otis off and why it wasnBԪַt predicted, especially since meteorologists have been dramatically improving their intensity forecasts in recent years.
BԪַThe models completely blew it,BԪַ said MIT atmospheric sciences professor Kerry Emanuel, a hurricane expert.
Experts point to lack of data on the storm and its surroundings and just not completely understanding what makes a storm act like itBԪַs on steroids.
And it really matters because in OtisBԪַ case, the storm was coming ashore when it muscled up.
BԪַItBԪַs one thing to have a Category 5 hurricane make landfall somewhere when youBԪַre expecting it,BԪַ McNoldy said. BԪַBut to have it happen when youBԪַre not expecting anything to happen is truly a nightmare.BԪַ
For example, McNoldy, who lives in Miami, said a tropical storm forecast would prompt him to BԪַdo things like move some lightweight furniture in and take down wind chimes and things like that. ThatBԪַs about it. YouBԪַre not preparing for a Category 5 hurricane.BԪַ
National Hurricane Center Director Michael Brennan said BԪַthatBԪַs a very bad scenario, populated area, rapid intensification very close to landfall, a change in the expectations about the impacts thatBԪַs happening on a time scale that doesnBԪַt give people a lot of time to respond.BԪַ
Brennan said OtisBԪַ unforeseen buildup was because BԪַit found a much more favorable environment than we were anticipating.BԪַ He said one part was warm water, another was that the winds BԪַ moving in the right direction and at the right altitude BԪַ allowed a somewhat raggedy storm to rapidly develop structure and strengthen.
McNoldy said there may be a mystery ingredient that scientists just donBԪַt know right now, but water is key.
Warm water is fuel for hurricanes. Hot, deep water is like an all-you-can-eat buffet.
Globally, the worldBԪַs oceans have been setting monthly surface heat records since April. The surface waters off the Mexican coast were warm but BԪַnot crazy warm,BԪַ said University at Albany atmospheric scientist Kristen Corbosiero. Bennan and McNoldy said those waters were maybe 1 or 2 degrees above normal.
Below that, the water was much hotter than usual BԪַand thereBԪַs just a ton of fuel out there right now,BԪַ McNoldy said. Still, the storm didnBԪַt linger and feed on that, which would be expected in rapid intensification, Brennan said.
The heat content in the deeper ocean worldwide has been ItBԪַs from human-caused climate change, McNoldy and other scientists said, as the oceans act as a sponge to absorb a lot of the excess heat caused by the burning of coal, oil and gas.
Otis and two other historically explosive cases of rapid intensification BԪַ Patricia in 2015 and Wilma in 2005 BԪַ all happened in the same mid- to late-October time frame, when deeper water and ocean heat content is at its highest, McNoldy said.
Numerous studies have shown globally that there are than there used to be. An official definition of rapid intensification is a gain in strength of 35 mph (56 kph) in 24 hours. , many of them just before smacking land. In 2017, two devastating hurricanes, Harvey and Maria, rapidly intensified. Last month in the Atlantic, Hurricane Lee rapidly intensified from 80 mph (129 kph) to 155 mph (249 kph), but didnBԪַt hit anywhere.
BԪַWeBԪַre seeing so many more cases of these just astonishing rapid intensification events,BԪַ said former National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration hurricane and climate scientist Jim Kossin, now with the First Street Foundation.
Kossin said that thereBԪַs evidence that whatBԪַs happening globally over a longer time frame is due in part to human-caused climate change but itBԪַs hard to say that about an individual storm.
But, he added, BԪַthis is exactly the kind of thing we would expect to find as the climate warms.BԪַ
MITBԪַs Emanuel said it might be more than just the waterBԪַs temperature, but its low salinity, too. Water in that area at this time of year is fresher from heavy rains at the surface, and that changes the mix of water temperature, he said. Normally a hurricane mixes the warm water on the surface with cooler water below. But when the surface water is fresher, a storm pulls up even more hot water from below, which feeds the storm more BԪַand before you know it, youBԪַre in hot water,BԪַ Emanuel said.
One key test of that theory is whether Otis leaves warm water in its wake. Usually, hurricanes leave behind cold water. Emanuel hopes satellite images will show it, but itBԪַs not certain whether theyBԪַll get the right view.
Another factor that Brennan and others mention is that perhaps forecasters underestimated OtisBԪַ original strength. That would mean it didnBԪַt intensify as much as it appears because it was stronger to begin with.
BԪַThe East Pacific in a lot of ways is a huge data void,BԪַ Brennan said. BԪַThereBԪַs no buoys. ThereBԪַs very few land observations. ThereBԪַs no radars along the west coast of Mexico. So weBԪַre really reliant almost entirely on satellite imagery.BԪַ
And sometimes satellites, looking at a storm from high above, cannot get an accurate picture of whatBԪַs going on.
Think of it like a jigsaw puzzle and forecasters at times have only 10% of the pieces, Brennan said.
Forecasters have far more tools to see whatBԪַs happening in Atlantic storms, he said.
___
Read more of APBԪַs climate coverage at
___
Follow Seth Borenstein on X, formerly known as Twitter at
___
Associated Press climate and environmental coverage receives support from several private foundations. See more about APBԪַs climate initiative The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Seth Borenstein, The Associated Press