BԪַ

Skip to content

Court dismisses case against CowichanBԪַs Vancouver Island Motorsport Circuit

Second lawsuit expected to be heard next year
13946636_web1_12884259_web1_9209873_web1_171102-CCI-M-web1_170418-CCI-M-Motorsport-resort-track-1
The BC Supreme Court has dismissed a lawsuit brought by neighbours against the Vancouver Island Motorsport Circuit and the Municipality of North Cowichan. File photo)

The BC Supreme Court has dismissed a lawsuit by neighbours of the Vancouver Island Motorsport Circuit in their efforts to put an immediate stop to what they claim is excessive noise from its operations.

But the six neighbours donBԪַt see the loss as the final chapter of their ongoing efforts to reduce the noise levels from the car track facility.

The VIMC opened in June 2016, on a 46-acre parcel of land on the Cowichan Valley Highway, and the levels of noise from the facility have led to complaints from neighbours since the beginning of its operations.

The neighbours filed the lawsuit against the VIMC and the Municipality of North Cowichan last year.

RELATED STORY:

According to their statement of claim, filed in June, 2017, the neighbours said the track is operating illegally with respect to the zoning bylaws of North Cowichan, which are not being enforced.

The neighbours were looking for the court to order that the municipalityBԪַs bylaws be enforced so that it would lead to the noise levels from the facility decreasing.

RELATED STORY:

But, on Oct. 12, Justice George Macintosh ruled that the plaintiffs, as a matter of law, canBԪַt seek to compel the enforcement of a municipal bylaw, absent an allegation of bad faith, BԪַwhich is not made hereBԪַ.

BԪַThe decisions of how and when to enforce municipal bylaws are within the sole province of the enacting municipality,BԪַ Macintosh said in his ruling.

Macintosh said the requests for the court to order that North CowichanBԪַs land-use and noise bylaws be enforced constitute an BԪַabuse of process in the limited, but relevant, sense that they constitute a collateral attack on the municipalityBԪַs application of its bylaws, which could only be brought by way of a judicial review.BԪַ

Macintosh also awarded some court costs to the defendants in the case.

But Macintosh didnBԪַt strike the whole submission from the neighbours, leaving in sections that contend the VIMC is a nuisance property.

Another lawsuit filed by the neighbours, which is not expected to be before the courts until next year, alleges that the provincial nuisance law prohibits anyone from BԪַsubstantial and unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of propertyBԪַ.

Macintosh said that, in his view, the sections of the submission that he left in may be relevant to the plaintiffsBԪַ claim in the nuisance court case.

BԪַThe plaintiffs, as part of their nuisance claim, are entitled to show, if they can, that any applicable bylaw noise limits are being violated by the VIMC,BԪַ Macintosh said.

BԪַThe court in the nuisance trial is permitted to take that information into account when determining whether nuisance has occurred.BԪַ

Mariah Wallener, a director with the Sahtlam Neighbourhood Association, which was also a plaintiff in the case until it dropped out of the lawsuit in February, said the lawsuit was seen as just an attempt at a BԪַtemporary fixBԪַ to the neighboursBԪַ issues until a more permanent solution can found.

BԪַThis is not a big loss,BԪַ she said.

BԪַOur nuisance case is still on and weBԪַre hoping to be successful there. A lot of people are saying we are trying to shut down the VIMC and that isnBԪַt true. We just want to stop the excessive noise until the permitted land-use issues can be addressed.BԪַ

Paul Rossmo, general manager of the VIMC, said he was BԪַvery happyBԪַ with the judgeBԪַs ruling.

BԪַIt went the way we expected and weBԪַre pleased with that,BԪַ he said.

BԪַBut it doesnBԪַt diminish our commitment to address these concerns and minimize the noise coming from the VIMC. ItBԪַs an ongoing process that weBԪַre focusing on every day. My commitment is to always do a good job and be a good neighbour.BԪַ



robert.barron@cowichanvalleycitizen.com

Like us on and follow us on



Robert Barron

About the Author: Robert Barron

Since 2016, I've had had the pleasure of working with our dedicated staff and community in the Cowichan Valley.
Read more



(or

BԪַ

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }