BԪַ

Skip to content

Academics, smaller telecoms say Rogers shouldnBԪַt be allowed to buy Freedom Mobile

Ben Klass said the government needs to stick with aiming for a fourth wireless carrier in every region
24762689_web1_20210405180416-606b8c8f2b5226a59b67e2c9jpeg
A woman holds two cellphones with the corporate logos of Rogers Communications and Shaw Communications in a photo illustration in Chelsea, Que., Monday March 29, 2021. A review of the proposed $26-billion purchase of Shaw Communications by Rogers Communications continues into its third day today in Ottawa before a committee of federal MPs. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld

Rogers Communications Inc. shouldnBԪַt be allowed to buy CanadaBԪַs fourth-largest wireless service, Freedom Mobile, because it would undo attempts improve prices and services through competition, experts in telecommunications policy told MPs on Tuesday.

In a third day of hearings into the Rogers proposal to buy Shaw Communications Inc., which owns Freedom and Western CanadaBԪַs largest internet network, University of Ottawa law professor Michael Geist said regulators should require a spinoff of the wireless assets before approving the deal.

BԪַWhile some seek to justify it or explain it away, the simple reality is that Canadians already pay some of the highest prices for wireless services in the world,BԪַ Geist said, echoing other opponents of the deal.

BԪַIf this merger is approved, the situation is likely to get worse. Indeed, when Rogers promises that it will not raise prices for Shaw Freedom Mobile customers for three years, it effectively signals that it will be raising them as soon as the clock runs out on that time.BԪַ

Shaw chief executive Brad Shaw and Rogers CEO Joe Natale told the same committee on March 29 that theyBԪַd be stronger competitors to Bell and Telus by combined their spending power and assets. That would allow the combined company to reach more rural and underserved areas, they said.

Brad Shaw also said the company founded by his father J.R. Shaw just wasnBԪַt big enough on its own to fund the enormous investments required to build fifth-generation wireless networks.

Under questioning, Geist BԪַ an expert in internet and e-commerce policy BԪַ said the BԪַmost palatableBԪַ outcome would be to have Shaw and Freedom to remain independent rivals to CanadaBԪַs biggest three biggest telecommunications companies.

BԪַShaw is a viable, innovative competitor,BԪַ Geist said. BԪַSo taking them out of the market BԪַ is a loss ultimately for consumers.BԪַ

Ben Klass, a member of a research team studying ownership concentration in CanadaBԪַs telecom and media industries, said the government needs to stick with aiming for a fourth wireless carrier in every region.

Most of the new wireless competitors that emerged in 2008 and 2009 have been absorbed by the Big Three. Shaw bought the largest independent, Wind Mobile, rebranding it as Freedom after the 2016 purchase.

BԪַWhat weBԪַre left with is Freedom (in Ontario, Alberta and B.C.) BԪַtron in Quebec, Eastlink in the Maritime provinces,BԪַ Klass said.

BԪַIf this merger is allowed, it would be tantamount to the governmentBԪַs admission that theyBԪַre no longer interested in supporting real competition in this space.BԪַ

The deal announced March 15 needs regulatory approval to go forward. Key officials, including the federal competition commissioner, are scheduled to address the committee on Wednesday.

READ MORE:

David Paddon, The Canadian Press


Like us on and follow us on .

Want to support local journalism during the pandemic? Make a donation





(or

BԪַ

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }